Arun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24519 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -139 Year- 2016 Thana -BISFI District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Arun Yadav S/o Late Basudeo Yadav, Resident of Village- Noor Chak, P.S.- Bisfi, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratanakar Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 12-06-2017 Heard Sri Ratanakar Jha, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Sri Ajaya Kumar Jha, learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in Bisfi P.S. Case No. 139/16 corresponding to G.R. No. 560/16 registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 354 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a case and counter-case and although the allegations are that of giving a Khanti blow by this petitioner causing injury, it is a case of false implication.

The learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that in the present case there is a specific allegation against this petitioner of causing injury by

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24519 of 2017 (2) dt.12-06-2017 2/2 Khanti and, therefore, it is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances stated here-in-above, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The prayer for anticipatory bail is refused.

If the petitioner surrenders in the court below within four weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the same would be considered on its own merit.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR U T