Arun Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30561 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2017 Thana -PARASI District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Arun Kumar, son of Krishna Ram, resident of Village- Haibatpur, P.S.- Rampur Chauram, District- Arwal.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Vigilance Investigation Bureau of Patna through its Director. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP Mr. Ramakant Sharma, LO, I/c, Vigilance ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 5/ 31-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. Also heard learned counsel appearing for the Vigilance Department.

The Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Parasi P.S. Case No.06 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 409, 420,467, 468, 471 Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged against this petitioner that during verification it was detected that serial no. of BETET mark-sheet of the petitioner was found different from the serial no. of the Bihar School Examination Board.

It has been submitted that there is no allegation against the petitioner that he has filed any forged certificate or caused tampering. It is just clerical mistake if such difference is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30561 of 2017 (5) dt.31-07-2017 2/2 detected.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Parasi P.S. Case No.06 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sri Arun Kumar, Sub Judge-I, Arwal, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T