Neeraj Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74844 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2024 Thana- KHUTAUNA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Neeraj Ram Son of Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Kumar Ram R/O VillageSiswabarhi, P.S.- Phulparas, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pintu Kumar Patel, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the informant placed the bag containing mobile and Aadhaar Card on the seat of motorcycle and parked the same next to the road and started urinating. In the meantime, four persons came from behind and took away the motorcycle of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of his self-confession made
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74844 of 2024(2) dt.22-10-2024 2/2 before the police. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the motorcycle in question. Learned counsel further submitted that except the confessional statement, there is no material against the petitioner implicating him in the present case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 27.07.2024 and has two criminal antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T