← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73525/2024bail granted

Durga Devi @ Durgi Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-23Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73525 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2024 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Durga Devi @ Durgi Devi W/o Chandeshwari Mandal R/o Gajahar Ward No. 02, P.S.- Triveniganj, Dist.- Supaul ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Kumar Goutam For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 106/2024 dated 08.03.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 304B and 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have strangulated the informant's daughter to death and hanged her dead body on the tree.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73525 of 2024(2) dt.23-10-2024 2/2 petitioner who is mother-in-law of the deceased. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the deceased. It is submitted that the deceased was not subjected to torture and cruelty soon before her death for or in connection with demand of dowry. The husband of the deceased has surrendered before the court below on 22.04.2024. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Supaul in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 106/2024, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T