Ramanuj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.67986 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2017 Thana- SOHSARAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Ramanuj Yadav S/o Balram Yadav Resident of Village-Narayanpur P.S. Makhdumpur,Distt. Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhijeet Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sohsarai P.S.Case No.290 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner as per FIR is that the ATM of the informant was lost and he got it closed but by that time some amount had been transferred from his account to the account of the petitioner.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the ATM of the petitioner had also lost and moreover though some amount had been transferred in his account but the same has been withdrawn immediately and the petitioner has falsely been implicated and moreover he has no criminal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67986 of 2018(2) dt.29-11-2018 2/2 antecedent. He is in custody for more than three months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Nalanda in connection with Sohsarai P.S.Case No.290 of 2017.. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U t