Pintu Rai @ Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71104 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2025 Thana- KHAIRA District- Saran ====================================================== Pintu Rai @ Pintu Kumar Son of Rajendra Rai Resident of Village- Bichali Badhar, Ps- Chapra muffasil, Dist- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 191(2), 190, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with other accused persons is alleged to have assaulted the informant. In the meanwhile, when villagers came there, all the accused persons managed to ran away but one of the accused persons,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71104 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 2/3 namely, Ritesh Rai, has been caught by the villagers and handed over to police with one pistol.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Ritesh Rai who has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 59136 of 2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2025 and has one criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, claim based on parity as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71104 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T