Shrawan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63601 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2018 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

SHRAWAN YADAV Son of Brahmdev Yadav Resident of Bhairopatti, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul 2.

Umesh Yadav Son of Late Shyam Ji Yadav Resident of Bhairopatti, Ward No. 2, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Nikesh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Triveniganj P.S.Case No.220 of 2018 dated 1.6.2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 448, 341, 323, 379, 380, 354B, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per FIR, there is specific allegation against the petitioners that they have assaulted the informant and further specific allegation is against the petitioner no.2 that he has disrobed the informant and made her naked and there is allegation of demand of rangdari also.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63601 of 2019(4) dt.13-12-2019 2/2 that except the petitioners, all the other persons have been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge and the injuries are not mentioned in the impugned order itself. On the other hand learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that there is specific allegation against the petitioners as stated above and there is also allegation that accused persons entered into the house and tried to outrage the modesty of the informant. .

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, however, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit. With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T