Mahendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72025 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2023 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.
MAHENDRA PRASAD SON OF LATE BANWARI BIND R/O VILLAGEBARAHULI, P.S.- ALI NAGAR, DISTRICT- CHANDAULI (U.P.) 2.
DURGAWATI DEVI WIFE OF MAHENDRA PRASAD R/O VILLAGEBARAHULI, P.S.- ALI NAGAR, DISTRICT- CHANDAULI (U.P.) 3.
SUJIT BIND @ SUJIT KUMAR SON OF MAHENDRA PRASAD R/O VILLAGE- BARAHULI, P.S.- ALI NAGAR, DISTRICT- CHANDAULI (U.P.) 4.
NIRAJ BIND @ NIRAJ KUMAR SON OF MAHENDRA PRASAD R/O VILLAGE- BARAHULI, P.S.- ALI NAGAR, DISTRICT- CHANDAULI (U.P.) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
GANESH BIND SON OF LATE SHUKALI BIND R/O VILLAGEKARGAO, P.S.- CHAINPUR, DIST.- KAIMUR AT BHABUA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-11-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 246 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections-406, 420, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, marriage of the informant's daughter was fixed with the petitioner No. 4 and at the time of marriage, the accused persons started demdanding some more money and on non-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72025 of 2023(2) dt.08-11-2023 2/2 fulfillment of the same, they refused to marry with the informant's daughter.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the daughter of the complainant/informant was a patient of leucoderma and concealing this fact, the complainant was attempting to solemnize the marriage of her daughter with the petitioner No. 4 and when he refused to marry the daughter of the complainant/informant, his entire family members have been implicated in this false case. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender, within four weeks from today, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 246 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T