← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26952/2017dismissed

Kumar Abhay Ranjan v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-07-04Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26952 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -9 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- PATNA ====================================================== Kumar Abhay Ranjan son of Sri Laxmi Narayan Singh, resident of village Hariharpur, P.O. Jasauli, P.S. Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan For O.P.No.2 :

Mr. Ansul For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chaubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Mahila (Patna) P.S.Case No.09 of 2017, for the offences under Sections 376 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 D of the I.T. Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he has committed rape upon the prosecutrix.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that now the situation has changed and the petitioner is ready to marry with the informant and a compromise petition to that effect has also been filed before the court below.

Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant. The learned counsel for the informant could not controvert the aforesaid submission.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26952 of 2017 (3) dt.04-07-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the above facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite commitment of the case and the same must be committed within a period of one week and further the trial be expedited. It is also made clear that once the prosecutix is examined in this case, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the court concerned itself, which will be considered on the basis of materials available at that time.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U