← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./73936/2022allowed

Madan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-03Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73936 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2022 Thana- KUSHESHWARASTHAN DistrictDarbhanga ====================================================== 1.

MADAN YADAV Son of Bindeshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Lakshminya, P.S. - K. Asthan, District - Darbhanga. 2.

Hare Ram Yadav Son of Rameshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Lakshminya, P.S. - K. Asthan, District - Darbhanga. 3.

Shobha Yadav Son of Rameshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Lakshminya, P.S. - K. Asthan, District - Darbhanga.

4.

Raj Kumar Yadav Son of Sabo Yadav Resident of Village - Lakshminya, P.S. - K. Asthan, District - Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajendra Prasad Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 308, 427, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with others co-accused persons is said to have abused and assaulted the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73936 of 2022(2) dt.03-02-2023 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. He submits that injury report has not supported the prosecution case. He further submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application. Learned APP for the State opposes for prayer for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with K. Sthan P.S. Case No.260/2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T