Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.75560 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-930 Year-2017 Thana- SAHARSA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Manoj Yadav Son of Surya Narayan Yadav Resident of Village-Bhelwa Ward No.6, P.S. and Distt.-Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Manish Kumar 2 (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 930 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner has earlier moved this Court for bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 40224 of 2018 which was rejected on 18.09.2018 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of six months.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the observation made in order dated 18.09.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40224 of 2018, petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75560 of 2018(2) dt.19-12-2018 2/2 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 930 of 2017, subject to conditions:
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T