Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.72820 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2018 Thana- PANDARAK District- Patna ====================================================== Raushan Kumar, Son of Mahtab Lal, Resident of Village- Rajpura, P.S.- Athmalgola, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Smt. Pronati Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in Special Case No. 8899 of 2018 arising out of Pandarak P.S. Case No. 96 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 18 Litres of country made liquor from the bag carrying by him. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 24.09.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72820 of 2018(2) dt.13-12-2018 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna, in connection with Special Case No. 8899 of 2018 arising out of Pandarak P.S. Case No. 96 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (4). If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.
(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U