Jainuddin v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29264 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -86 Year- 2017 Thana -SIMRI District- BUXAR ====================================================== Jainuddin Son of Abdul Jabbar, Resident of Village- Barkagaon Mansingh Path, Police Station- Buxar (Ind), District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 86 of 2017, registered for the offences punishable under sections 414, 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one Bolero vehicle which is said to be stolen one. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the manner in which verification of the vehicle has been made creates serious doubt against the prosecution case and he is in custody for two months.

Heard learned APP also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29264 of 2017 (3) dt.18-07-2017 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances that it is a stolen vehicle and the petitioner has criminal antecedent, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. As such prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) S.Sb/- U T