Manish Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28521 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28521 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -129 Year- 2016 Thana -MATIHANI District- BEGUSARAI ======================================================
1. Manish Kumar Son of Sri Prahalad Singh, Resident of Village- Bagdobh, Police Station Naya Gaon in the district of Begusarai.
2. Dilip Kumar, Son of Sri Dashrath Singh, Resident of Village- Chhitraur, Police Station- Matihani, in the district of Begusarai. .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Renuka Ratnakar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP representing the State.
The petitioners want to renew their prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 28.01.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 54569 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioners are in custody since 21.10.2016 and they were given liberty to renew their prayer of bail after remaining six months in custody and now they have remained in custody for more than six months. Learned APP fairly submits that the petitioners were given liberty.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28521 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S. S. Oraon, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 129 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on their part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioners from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T