Sharvan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.74319 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-424 Year-2018 Thana- GARDANIBAG District- Patna ====================================================== SHARVAN KUMAR Son of Ravindra Das Resident of Village-Barni,P.S. Dhanarua,Distt.-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rudra Deo For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 424 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 419, 420, 457, 468, 471, 472, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against petitioner is that he did not appear in written and physical test which was held by the Board and in his place another candidate appeared.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 24.09.2018.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.74319 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge XIV cum- A.C.J.M., Patna, in connection with Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 424 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T