Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76114/2018bail granted

Md. Sahid Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-19Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.76114 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2018 Thana- MUSRIGHRARI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Md. Sahid Hussain, son of Sri Abdul Badud, Resident of village Morba Gopal Tola, P.S. Musrigharari, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Malay Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 100 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of Arms Act.

Informant who is the Police Officer has alleged that on the confession made by the petitioner arms were recovered from the house Abdul Mannan. Petitioner is in custody since 02.08.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76114 of 2018(2) dt.19-12-2018 2/2 Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Samastipur, in connection with Musrigharari P.S. Case No. 100 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T