← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66135/2019bail rejected

Sunny Kumar @ Sunny Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-17Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66135 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2019 Thana- SINGHWARA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Sunny Kumar @ Sunny Kumar Sharma, Son of Kishori Sharma Resident of Village- Singhwara North, P.S.- Singhwara, District- Darbhanga. 2.

Ram Bharosa Thakur @ Ram Bharos Thakur Son of Domu Thakur Resident of Village- Singhwara North, P.S.- Singhwara, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra- Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit- A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-06-2020 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State through video conferencing.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Singhwara P. S. Case No.72 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504 of the I.P.C.

There is allegation against these petitioners that they assaulted the informant and others by means of deadly weapon. However, it is submitted that there is case and counter-case between the parties and persons from both sides sustained injury.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66135 of 2019(4) dt.17-06-2020 2/2 Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioners and, accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, it is made clear that at the time of consideration of regular bail application of the petitioners, the concerned Court shall not be prejudiced by this rejection order and shall pass appropriate order on regular bail application of the petitioners particularly keeping in mind that both the parties sustained injury and there is case and counter-case between the parties.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) vikash/- U T