Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69026 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2025 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Deepak Kumar S/O Ram Ayodhya Ray R/O village - Vishwanathpur @ Bishwanathpur @ Bishanathpur, P.S. - Dumra (wrongly stated in the F.I.R. of the Page no. -2, P.S. - Pupri), Dist. - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Renu Kumari, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 243 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 309(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per prosecution case, two unknown persons entered into the bank and one of them fired but, it missed and another person attempted to get the cash box. In the meantime, one of the miscreants apprehended by the nearby people and police was informed. The apprehended persons disclosed his name as Deepak Kumar (the petitioner).

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69026 of 2025(2) dt.07-10-2025 2/3 against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to dirty village politics and highhandedness of his enemies. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has five criminal antecedents and, in all of them, he is on bail and is languishing in judicial custody since 02.07.2025 without any rhymes or reason. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 243 of 2025, subject to the following conditions; (i) One of the bailor(s) shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69026 of 2025(2) dt.07-10-2025 3/3 court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T