Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69507 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-335 Year-2022 Thana- CIVIL LINE District- Gaya ====================================================== GOLU KUMAR S/o Kailash Munsi @ Kailash Prasad Swarnkar@ Kailash Prasad R/o Mohalla- Tilha, Dharamshala, P.S.- Civil Lines, Distt- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satya Veer For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 24-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Civil Line P.S. Case No. 335 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363/511/380 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation, the petitioner entered into the flat of the informant and he forcibly ran away with three and half year son of the informant but he was apprehended and the child of the informant was rescued from his possession. The informant has mentioned that he had already lodged a case against co-accused Rakesh Kumar which is Muffasil P.S. Case No. 7 of 2022, and she had suspicion that at the instance of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69507 of 2022(4) dt.24-04-2023 2/2 Rakesh Kumar, the petitioner has kidnapped the minor son of the informant.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is innocent. He has no connection with Rakesh Kumar. He is water supplier and has falsely been implicated. He has further submitted that it has also come in supervision note that the petitioner has no relation with Rakesh Kumar. On the other hand, the learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner was apprehended when he was fleeing away with minor son of the informant and he was handed over to the police. The learned counsel has also submitted that the petitioner has criminal history of similar nature of cases.

Considering the above-mentioned facts, I do not find it to be a proper case for grant of bail. Accordingly, it is rejected.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/- U T