Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70028/2025bail granted

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-09Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70028 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Yadav S/O Triveni Rai Resident Of Village - Thikha Bahadurpur, P.S- Goraul, Dist.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 80, 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is the husband of the deceased and it is alleged that the petitioner along with other accused persons have killed the deceased for demand of dowry after brutally assaulting her.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 21.06.2025.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the deceased has committed suicide and he also submits that the post-mortem report does not support the FIR as in the postmortem report, no mark of assault is found on the body of the deceased and there is only one ligature mark on the neck of the deceased. He further submits that the charge-sheet has already been submitted in the case and if the petitioner is released on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70028 of 2025(3) dt.09-10-2025 2/2 bail, he will co-operate in the trial.

6. Learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the application of the petitioner and has submitted that the deceased was tortured and thereafter she was done to death but he has not been able to explain the absence of external injuries on the body of the deceased.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and the period of custody of the petitioner, this application is allowed.

8. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-I, Vaishali at Hajipur/concerned Court below in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025.

9. As a condition of this order, the petitioner, after being released on bail is directed to co-operate in the trial either by appearing personally or through his lawyer in the trial Court on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Non-compliance of the condition will result in cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U