Upender Saw @ Upendra Saw @ Jiten Saw v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68601 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-394 Year-2022 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== UPENDER SAW @ UPENDRA SAW @ JITEN SAW SON OF RAMEET SAW @ RANJIT SAO R/O VILLAGE- DEOWAGANA (DEOGANA), P.S.- NABINAGAR, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 394 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 25(1-b), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The case relates to recovery of one country made pistol from the waist of the petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that it appears form the F.I.R. and the seizure list that one country made pistol has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68601 of 2022(3) dt.17-04-2023 2/3 contends that, in fact, nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been planted with ulterior motive. He further submits that Section 100 of the Cr.P.C. has not been compiled by the prosecution while preparing the seizure list. He further submits that the police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet in this case against the petitioner. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 15.10.2022.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 394 of 2022 with the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68601 of 2022(3) dt.17-04-2023 3/3 without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) brajesh/- U T