Vijay Uraon And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12063 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -699 Year- 2017 Thana -WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Vijay Uraon, S/o Ramkishun Uraon @ Krishna Uraon,

2. Ramkishun Uraon @ Krishna Uraon, S/o Mahanth Uraon,

3. Rajkali Devi, W/o Ramkishun Uraon @ Krishna Uraon, All R/o Marjadpur, P.S.- Semra (Chiutaha O.P.), District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Ranjana Devi W/o Vijay Uraon D/o Sheshnath Uraon, R/o VillageMarjadpur, P.S.- Semra (Chiutaha O.P.) District- West Champaran. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Vijay Kr Singh No. 1, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 323 and 498(A) of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioners tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12063 of 2018 (2) dt.05-03-2018 2/2 implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner no. 1 is the husband of the victim. Petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the victim. The petitioners have further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-Ist, Bagaha, West Champaran, in connection with Tr. No. 1968 of 2017, arising out of Complaint Case No. C-699 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T