← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3012/2023disposed

Chandan Prakash v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-06Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3012 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.508 of 2023 ====================================================== Chandan Prakash (M), S/o Madan Mohan Ray Resident of- Narayani Vatika, Jail Road, Sumeshwar Asthan P.S.-Model Thana, District - Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through K Senthil Kumar, Son of Not Known to the Petitioner, Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar.

2.

Anshul Kumar, Son of Not Known to Petitioner, District Magistrate, Buxar. 3.

Kumar Ravi, Son of Not Known to Petitioner, Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.

4.

Amir Ahmad, Son of Not known to the Petitioner, District Arms Magistrate, Buxar.

5.

Pramod Kumar, Son of Not Known to the Petitioner, Additional District Magistrate, Buxar.

6.

Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, Son of Not known to the Petitioner, Sub Divisional Officer, Buxar.

7.

Manish Kumar, Son of Not Known to The Petitioner, Superintendent of Police, Buxar.

8.

Dinesh Kumar, Son of Not Known to Petitioner, S.H.O., Model, Town Thana, Buxar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manisha Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, SC 8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 The learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that in compliance of the order of this Court dated 29.03.2023 passed in CWJC No. 508 of 2023, the application filed by the petitioner for grant of arms licence has been rejected by an order dated 03.11.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Buxar in Case No. 596 of 2023 and 597 of 2023.

Patna High Court MJC No.3012 of 2023(4) dt.06-02-2026 2/2

2. In view of the aforesaid, while disposing of the present contempt petition, I deem it fit and proper to grant liberty to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid order dated 03.11.2023 by taking recourse to the due process of law, if so advised.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) GAURAV S./- U