Kishore Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12720 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -385 Year- 2017 Thana -CHANDI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Kishore Yadav, S/o Loki Yadav, R/o village- Neerpur, P.S.- Chandi, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rudal Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh -5, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Chandi P.S. Case No. 385 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased. It has further been submitted that petitioner has no concern with husband of the deceased.

From perusal of the written report it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12720 of 2018 (2) dt.08-03-2018 2/2 weeks from today, in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 385 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, (Nalanda), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T