Raju Saw v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70207 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-522 Year-2022 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Raju Saw S/o Shyam Nandan Saw Resident of Village- Parari, P.S- Bihta, District- Patna.

2.

Milan Saw S/O Shyam Nandan Saw Resident of Village- Parari, P.S- Bihta, District- Patna.

3.

Annand Kumar S/O Mukesh Saw Resident of Village- Parari, P.S- Bihta, District- Patna.

4.

Shivam Kumar S/O Milan Saw Resident of Village- Parari, P.S- Bihta, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Sailesh Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-01-2026 Heard Mr. Sailesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on account of trivial dispute, all these accused petitioners assaulted informant and his family members as a result of which, five persons sustained injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70207 of 2025(4) dt.13-01-2026 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of any overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Doctor has found the injuries, sustained by the injured, simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 1st, Danapur, Patna in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 522 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70207 of 2025(4) dt.13-01-2026 3/3 B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T