Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36647/2017dismissed

Murari Ravidas @ Murari Ravi v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-06Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36647 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2017 Thana -RUPAULI District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. MURARI RAVIDAS @ MURARI RAVI Son of Shahdev Ravidas, R/o Village- Jangal Tola, P.S.- Rupauli (Mohanpur), District- Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-09-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Rupauli (Mohanpur) P.S.Case No.71 of 2017 , registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to make correction in para 14 of the petition.

Permission is granted.

The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and allegation against the petitioner is of causing death of the deceased. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except suspicion, there is nothing against the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted he

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36647 of 2017 (3) dt.06-09-2017 2/2 has nothing to do with the land sold to the informant as well as the deceased as the land was sold by some other persons and now the petitioner is in custody for about four months. Heard learned A.P.P. also and the learned counsel for the informant. They have opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the petitioner was threatening to the deceased after purchase of the land and in that connection the deceased and the informant has also lodged Sanaha before the S.D.O. about the alleged threat made by the petitioner.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of nine months.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T