Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2460 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9543 of 2020 ====================================================== Ashok Kumar Son of Late Mathura Prasad, resident of Village- Uttarnawan, Police Station- Rahui, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Amir Subahani the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Arvind Chaudhary one Principal Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Shashank Shubhankar, the District Magistrate, Nalanda, DistrictNalanda. 4.

Sri Rakesh Kumar, the Deputy Development Commission, Nalanda, District- Nalanda.

5.

Sri Vivek Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Rahui, Block Rahui, Police Station- Rahui, District- Nalanda.

6.

Kumar Shekhar Kumar, Junior Engineer, Block- Rahui, Police StationRahui, District- Nalanda. 7.

Sri Pawan Kumar, the Block Programme Officer, MANREGA Rahui, BlockRahui, Police Station- Rahui, District- Nalanda. 8.

Upendra Kumar Singh, the Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj Uttarnama, Block- Rahui, Police Station- Rahui, District- Nalanda. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. S. Raza Ahmad (AAG- 5).

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 11-10-2023 The present M.J.C./Contempt Petition is filed for non-compliance of the order of this Court dated 23.12.2020 passed in C.W.J.C. No.9543 of 2020.

2. Perusal of the records read with the reliefs sought

Patna High Court MJC No.2460 of 2022(5) dt.11-10-2023 2/2 in the aforementioned writ petition and representation are not tallying with each other. That apart, the petitioner has not apprised which are the Welfare Schemes to be implemented by the authorities. Merely mentioning that the Welfare Scheme is required to be implemented, is very vague and one cannot draw inference as to which are the relevant schemes to be implemented.

3. In the light of these facts and circumstances, the present M.J.C./Contempt Petition stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition with specific prayer. Before filing such petition, the petitioner is required to approach the competent authority in filing representations for execution of particular existing schemes in detail. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Arun Kumar Jha, J) P.S./-Manish/- U