Ranjeet Kumar Sah @ Ranjeet Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37073 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -584 Year- 2016 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar Sah @ Ranjeet Kumar Son of Gorakh Sah Resident of Village- Lahurbari, P.S.- Mohaniya, District- Kaimur, Bhabhua. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Nitu Devi wife of Ranjeet Kumar D/o- Lalan Sah Resident of VillageLahurbari, P.S.- Mohaniya, District- Kaimur, Bhabhua, At present Resident of Village- Dumri, P.S.- Chenari, District- Rohtas. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Chaubey Jawahar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 04.06.2017 in connection with Complaint Case No. 584/2016 for the offences instituted under Sections 323, 341, 498(A), 494 of the IPC and 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act in which the court below found prima facie case under Sections 498(A) of the IPC and 4 of the D.P. Act for summoning the petitioner.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the complainant due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37073 of 2017 (2) dt.10-08-2017 2/2 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2017. He has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. He has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Complaint Case No. 584/2016. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T