← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77901/2023disposed

Rekha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-10Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77901 of 2023 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51536 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-572 Year-2013 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR DistrictPurnia ====================================================== Rekha Devi Wife Of Navin Mahto Resident Of Village - Parora, P.S. - K. Nagar, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 10-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. Petitioner in this case has been seeking modification of the order dated 10.12.2015 passed by this Court in Cr.Misc. No.51536 of 2015 whereby and whereunder the petitioner had been granted privilege of pre-arrest bail and it was directed that in case of her arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order she will be released on bail on furnishing bail of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with K. Nagar P.S. Case No.572 of 2013.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact the petitioner belongs to Adiwasi community and she had

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77901 of 2023(2) dt.10-01-2024 2/3 gone outside the State of Bihar for earning her livelihood. Earlier she had filed an anticipatory bail application but after filing of the case she had left for the State of Punjab for earning her livelihood, therefore, she could not get any information about the grant of anticipatory bail and the requirement to surrender within six weeks.

4. Learned counsel submits that the case has not proceeded as yet and the petitioner has not been declared absconder.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed this application. It is submitted that there is an extraordinary delay on the part of the petitioner in submitting herself to the jurisdiction of the court and that must have resulted in the arrest of the trial.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered opinion that in case the learned court below has not proceeded with the case and the petitioner has not been declared absconder, only in such circumstance if she surrenders and submits her bail bond in terms of the order dated 10.12.2015, the same shall be accepted. In case the petitioner has been declared absconder by the learned court below, the petitioner cannot get benefit of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77901 of 2023(2) dt.10-01-2024 3/3 order dated 10.12.2015 passed in Cr.Misc. No.51536 of 2015 and on surrender she would be required to seek regular bail in accordance with law.

7. This application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T