Mahendra Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6651 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2017 Thana- MARAUNA District- Supaul ======================================================

1. Mahendra Yadav, Son of Upendra Yadav,

2. Bholtu Yadav, Son of Late Raj Kumar Yadav,

3. Subhash Yadav, Son of Suresh Yadav, All are Resident of Village-Barhara Tola-Tetarahi, Ward No.2, Police Station Marauna, District Supaul.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. None.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-02-2018 Heard Sri Arun, learned counsel for the petitioners None appeared on behalf of the State.

Three petitioners, apprehending their arrest in Marauna P.S. Case No.48/2017 registered for the offence under Sections 147,148,341, 323, 324, 307, 354(A), 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, have prayed for grant of bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender.

Learned counsel for the petitioners, while pressing the prayer for bail, submits that there was case and counter case in between the parties. He further submits that injury, which was caused on the injured, does not corroborate the allegation, which has been alleged in the F.I.R. It has been argued that out of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6651 of 2018(2) dt.12-02-2018 2/2 eleven accused persons, eight accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by the same impugned order, however the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners has been rejected.

Besides hearing learned counsel for the parties, I have also perused the material available on record and after going through the same, the Court is satisfied that there is specific accusation against all the three petitioners and, as such, I do not find any ground for extending the privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners stands rejected.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) nawalkrs/- U T