Ravi Yadav @ Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75647 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-470 Year-2021 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== RAVI YADAV @ RAVI KUMAR Son of Niraj Kumar R/o mohalla - Ghugari Tard, Bypass, Dandibagh, P.S. - Gaya Muffasil, Distt. - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priya Ranjan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 470 of 2021 dated 12.09.2021 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 25(1-a), 26(II) and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant along with armed forces proceeded to village Salempur Chamunda Asthan and he saw that some miscreants were indulged in firing. On seeing the police personnel, they fled away. It is further alleged that four empty cartridges, one pillet, one country made pistol, one black color air gun and one red color Scooty were recovered from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75647 of 2023(2) dt.13-12-2023 2/2 the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case during the course of investigation. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has three criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 470 of 2021, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T