← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38846/2017bail granted

Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-31Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38846 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -85 Year- 2017 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar Son of Ramakant Pandey, R/o Jhakhari Mahadeo, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anant Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-08-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Danapur P.S.Case no.85 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is not named in the FIR and it appears that his name transpired during the course of investigation on confession of the co-accused.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except confession, there is nothing against the petitioner, no recovery and nothing incriminating articles have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner as well as he is in custody for about six months.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38846 of 2017 (3) dt.31-08-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Danapur in connection with Danapur P.S.Case No.85 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T