Singhashan Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.12209 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2017 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Singhashan Devi W/o Late Arjun Yadav, R/o Village- Punit Bigha, P.S.- Hulashganj, Distt.- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nitya Nand Neeraj For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Shailendra Kumar -1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Hulashganj P.S. case no. 97/2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302, 304B, 328,341,323 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased. In the written report, there is allegation that accused person got the niece of the informant killed by administering poison. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that husband of the deceased is already in custody. There is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12209 of 2018(3) dt.06-04-2018 2/2 petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Hulashganj P.S. case no. 97/2017, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Judge Ist, Jehanabad/concerned Court, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T