Shyama Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64186 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2019 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

SHYAMA PANDIT, aged about 93 years, Male, S/O Late Parikshan Pandit, Resident of Village- Dewariya, P.S. Taraiya, District- Saran (Chapra) 2.

Bikrama Pandit, aged about 561⁄2 years, Male, S/O Shyama Pandit, Resident of Village- Dewariya, P.S. Taraiya, District- Saran (Chapra) 3.

Sudish Kumar, aged about 29 years, Male, S/O Bikrama Pandit, Resident of Village- Dewariya, P.S. Taraiya, District- Saran (Chapra) ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. S.R.P. Sinha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kapil Deo Singh, APP For the State :

Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Harish Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the state.

The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 195 of 2019 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 210, 218, 323, 341, 120B, 379, 417, 420, 467, 468, 406, 409 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that plots covers under khata no. 125, survey nos. 593 and 578 in respect to 1 katha and 7 dhurs area is in the name of the informant, Nagendra Prasad Singh, but, petitioners, in collusion with other named accused, who are officials of the Circle Office, Taraiya, Saran at Chapra, got entered their names in respect to two plots.

Submission is that the two plots, which were entered in the names of the petitioners was settled to petitioners by ex-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64186 of 2019(2) dt.22-10-2019 2/2 land lord, due to that reason their names were mutated in the revenue paper. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant vehementally opposed the prayer of pre-arrest bail with submission that taking into consideration the seriousness made against the petitioners, prayer for pre-arrest bail has already been rejected by the learned Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra, in detail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of surrender/arrest, within a period of four weeks from today, in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 195 of 2019 shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, I, Saran at Chapra, or the successor Court subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Criminal Procedure Code. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Shamshad/- U T