Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71210 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2025 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada ====================================================== Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Yadav Son of Late Chamari Yadav Resident of Village - Kapsandi, P.S. - Pakribarawan, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pakaribarawan P.S. Case No. 244 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, the accusation against the accused Manoj Yadav (the petitioner) and one Azad Rayin of abusing, assaulting and firing upon the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71210 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 2/3 It is further submitted that both the parties are co-villagers and there is a land dispute between them for last many years. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that in the alleged occurrecne of firing, the informant has not sustained any fire-arm injury. The petitioner has nine criminal antecedents and is languishing in judicial custody since 19.06.2025 without any rhymes or reason.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner, stating that the offence alleged is serous in nature and the petitioner bears nine criminal antecedents.

6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail, after framing of charge if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Pakaribarawan P.S. Case No. 244 of 2025, subject to the following conditions; (i) One of the bailor(s) shall be the own/close family

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71210 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 3/3 members of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T