Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70448 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2025 Thana- Sarbahada District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar S/o- Jamendra Yadav @ Jayendra Yadav Village - Bhavani Bigha, P.s.- Sarbahda, Dist- Gaya Ji 2.
Jamendra Yadav @ Jayendra Yadav S/o- Late Ladu Yadav Village - Bhavani Bigha, P.s.- Sarbahda, Dist- Gaya Ji ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 74, 303(2), 324(4), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on the alleged date and time, when informant was at his house, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, variously armed, came there and assaulted informant and others. It is alleged that petitioner no. 1 assaulted on the head of Birendra Yadav by means of iron rod and petitioner no. 2 along with co-accused Sonu Kumar assaulted Binod Yadav by means of lathi.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70448 of 2025(2) dt.08-10-2025 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of land dispute, a free fight took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Injuries, allegedly, caused by these petitioners are simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation, injuries and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Gayaji in connection with Sarbahda P. S. Case No. 43 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T