Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46488/2017bail granted

Sonu Kumar Yadav @ Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46488 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46488 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -250 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA ====================================================== SONU KUMAR YADAV @ SONU KUMAR @ SONU YADAV son of Sikandar Yadav of village Chhath Pokhar, P.S. Maranga, District Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Bidhu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chaubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with K. Hat (Sahayak) P.S.Case No.250 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)A, 36/35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has been made accused on the basis of confession of the other co-accused. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no recovery and he is in custody since 19.6.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Purnea, in connection with K. hat (Sahayk)

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46488 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017 P.S.Case No.250 of 2017 .

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T