Prahlad Kumar @ Pahlad Kumar @ Prahlad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75835 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2024 Thana- SIRARI District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Prahlad Kumar @ Pahlad Kumar @ Prahlad Yadav Son of Narayan Yadav @ Bhomu Yadav Resident of Village - Baibigha, P.S. - Ariyari, District - Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 12-11-2024 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Sirari P.S. Case No. 20/2024 registered on 04.06.2024 for the offenses punishable under Section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending before the C.J.M., Sheikhpura.
3. As per the prosecution, the petitioner along with other accused persons made an attempt to kill the informant by resorting fire.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The accusation of resorting fire upon the informant is not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75835 of 2024(2) dt.12-11-2024 2/2 specific against the petitioner and the antecedent of the petitioner is clean.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail.
6. In view of this Court, it is a fit case for consideration of prayer for regular bail.
7. Hence, it is directed to the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court within a period of four weeks from today. In the event, that the petitioner, surrenders within four weeks from today, then the Trial Court is directed to pass an order on his surrender-cum-bail application on its own merit, on the same day without being prejudiced that the anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been rejected.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U T