Rama Shankar Paswan, v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21656 of 2019 ====================================================== Rama Shankar Paswan, Son of Jag Narayan Paswan, Resident of VillageSondihara, Police Station-Bhabhua, District-Kaimur (Bhabhua). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabhua). 3.
The Superintendent of Police, Kaimur (Bhabhua). 4.
The Sub Divisional Officer cum Sub Divisional Nilam Patra Padadhikari, Kaimur (Bhabhua).
5.
The Manager, Punjab National Bank, Branch-Ratwar, Bhabhua, Kaimur (Bhabhua).
6.
The Station-in-Charge, Bhabhua Police Station, Kaimur (Bhabhua). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumar Sunil, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Sheeo Shankar Prasad, SC-8 Mr. Anil Kumar, AC to SC-8 For the PNB :
Mr. Sriram Krishna, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 15-12-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "I. For a Direction upon the Respondents particularly Respondent No. 4, to allow the Petitioner to file objection under Section 9 of the Public Demand Recovery Act in connection with Nilam Patra / Certificate Case No. 45 (B) of 2008-09 which is pending upon him.
II. For stay of warrant of Arrest if any issued against the Petitioner in connection with Certificate Case No. 45 (B) of 2008-09 by the Respondent No. 3 and
2/4 6.
III. Any other relief/ reliefs of the Petitioner may found entitled be given to him under the facts of the case."
It is not in dispute that petition under Section 9/60 of the Bihar & Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") is pending consideration/petitioner intends to file before the appropriate authority.
Learned counsel for the parties jointly pray that the instant petition be disposed of with direction to the appropriate authority to consider and decide the same expeditiously. Learned counsel for the State states that the appropriate authority shall consider and decide the petition filed/ to be filed by the petitioner under Section 9/60 of the Act positively within a period of two months from the date of appearance of the petitioner before him along with a copy of this order and the issue of limitation shall not come in the way of decision on merits.
Statement accepted and taken on record.
As such, petition stands disposed of in the following terms:- (a) Petitioner shall appear in the office of the
3/4 appropriate authority on 02.01.2023 along with a copy of this order, on which date documents in support of the petition shall be filed, or else file a fresh petition under Section 9/60 of the Act.
(b) The appropriate authority shall consider and dispose of the petitioner's petition expeditiously, by a reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a period of two months from the date of appearance of the petitioner before him and till then no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner; (c) The authority shall also examine as to whether the amount in question falls within the definition of public demand or not;
(d) Needless to add, while considering such petition, principles of natural justice shall be followed and due opportunity of hearing afforded to the parties; (e) Order assigning reasons shall be supplied to the parties;
(f) Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law;
(g) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law,
4/4 before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch; (h) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the order passed by the appropriate authority, before the appropriate forum, if so required and desired.
(i) We have not expressed any opinion on merits. All issues are left open;
The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/PKP U