Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48668/2017bail granted

Sudhir Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48668 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48668 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2 Year- 2017 Thana -HATHAURI District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Sudhir Mandal S/o Late Umesh Mandal, R/o Village- Berai, P.S.- Hathauri, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No. 2 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 361 litres of liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from his possession. Further he has not been arrested on spot and it will be evident from the F.I.R itself that the recovery has been made from the hut of one Mukesh Singh. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 29.06.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48668 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No. 2 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T