Khush Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74182 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2024 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Khush Ranjan Kumar Son of Ramashankar Prasad Resident of Village - Kamal Pipra, P.S. - Paharpur, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Umeshanand Pandit, APP For the Informant :
Ms. Shivani Kumari, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 22-10-2024 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Chairaiya P.S. Case No. 234 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Section 394 IPC, lodged on 03.06.2024 by the informant, Karun Kumar.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that in the morning of 03.06.2024, he had taken Rs. 10,76, 360/- from the Finance Company and he was going to the SCP Centre, but two accused persons riding on a motorcycle without number plate put a pistol on him and looted the amount along with other documents. Accordingly, the FIR.
4. Subsequently, the name of the petitioner came, his house was raided and besides recovery of Rs. 28,000/- a country
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74182 of 2024(2) dt.22-10-2024 2/2 made pistol, three live cartridges were also recovered.
5. The case of the petitioner is that he had no role to play and has got no criminal antecedent, but Ms. Shivani Kumari, learned counsel for the informant pointed out that as per his own showing, there is recovery of pistol and three live cartridges from his house and despite that para-3 shows that he has no criminal antecedent.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts as also the allegation that has come against the petitioner of looting Rs. 10 Lacs and further has rightly been pointed out by the learned counsel for the informant that despite recovery of arms from his house, para-3 shows that he has got no criminal antecedent, in that background, no relief can be granted to the petitioner. The bail application, accordingly, stands rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) perwez U T