Ankit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72945 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-413 Year-2025 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Ankit Kumar S/O Ashok Saw @ Ashok Kumar Resident of Mohalla - Shantinagar Balti Factory ( Ramgarh), Jehanabad, P.S- Jehanabad,Dist.- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 413 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 305(b) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that motorcycle of the informant was stolen from the gate of Soya Mill and the informant tracked his motorcycle through G.P.S. and caught two miscreants who stole his motorcycle. It is further alleged that the petitioner was one of the miscreants.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72945 of 2025(2) dt.30-10-2025 2/2 incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the petitioner was a passerby of that way and was apprehended on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner is in custody since 19.06.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 413 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T