← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16510/2017dismissed

Bhikhari Rai And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-21Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16510 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Bhikhari Rai son of late Sukhdev Rai

2. Sikandar Rai son of Bhikhari Rai Both residents of village-Hariharpur, P.O. - Majhaulia, P.S. - Bathnahar, District Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Collector, Sitamarhi.

3. The District Certificate Officer, Sitamarhi.

4. The Branch Manager, Syndicate Bank, Kamaldah, Branch - Sitamarhi.

5. Janki Enterprises, Authorised Dealer Eicher Tractors, Old Private Bus Stand Sursand Road, Sitamarhi at present Shantinagar, Dumra Road, Sitamarhi. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Anuradha Singh - SC 21 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 21-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents for recall of the order dated 24.12.2016 passed by Certificate Officer, Sitamarhi in Certificate Case No. 130/2014-15 whereby and whereunder he had issued warrant against petitioners.

3. At the very outset, this Court takes note that the petitioners had approached the Certificate Officer for recall of the said order dated 24.12.2016 in terms of their petition (Annexure-5) which was disposed on 02.08.2017 rejecting the prayer for recall. The said order dated 02.08.2016 has however not been challenged in the

Patna High Court CWJC No.16510 of 2017 dt.21-02-2018 2/2 present writ petition. No sufficient reason has been shown on behalf of the petitioners for grant of the relief sought.

4. In the above view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter. The writ petition stands dismissed. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 24.08.2018 Transmission Date N.A.