← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16622/2024dismissed

Ravindra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-29Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16622 of 2024 ====================================================== Ravindra Kumar Singh Son of Late Pradeep Singh Resident of VillageChamtha Barkhut, Police Station- Bachhwara, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, District- Begusarai. 4.

The District Education Officer, District- Begusarai. 5.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, District- Begusarai. 6.

The Block Education Officer, Vidyapati Nagar, Bachhwara, DistrictBegusarai. 7.

The Head Master, Middle School, Chamtha Chakki, Bachhwara, DistrictBegusarai. 8.

Yatendra Kumar Singh alias Satyendra Singh Son of Late Pradeep Singh Resident of Village- Chamtha Barkhut, Police Station- Bachhwara, DistrictBegusarai. 9.

Surendra Kumar Singh Son of Late Pradeep Singh Resident of VillageChamtha Barkhut, Police Station- Bachhwara, District- Begusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel 23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-10-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That the petitioner craves indulgence of this Hon'ble Court for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions, command/commands for directing the respondents-1st set to enquire the

Patna High Court CWJC No.16622 of 2024(2) dt.29-10-2024 2/2 date of birth of respondents-IInd set which is false and further for taking stern action against the respondent no.8."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondents for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U