Anand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70536 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2025 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Anand Kumar Son of Kapil Manjhi Village -Purani Taridih PS -Bodhgaya, Dist- Gaya 2.

Ranju Manjhi Son of Ramsevak Manjhi Village -Purani Taridih PS -Bodhgaya, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-11-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 191(2), 190, 303(2), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his son was taking his motorcycle for servicing when Anand along with other accused persons took his motorcycle and when informant along with his son went to bring the motorcycle back, when accused persons assaulted him further 15 named accused persons along with 10-15 unknown

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70536 of 2025(2) dt.01-11-2025 2/3 accused assaulted his son causing injury and snatched Rs. 5,000/-

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no specific allegation of assault is alleged, rather the allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that though it is alleged that several accused assaulted his son, but then only one wound on scalp was found. It is next submitted that the son of the informant was driving the motorcycle and an accident occurred on account of which he sustained injury.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70536 of 2025(2) dt.01-11-2025 3/3 the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No. 182 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T