Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70634 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2019 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== CHANDAN KUMAR Son of Tola Sao @ Satya Nand Saw Resident of Village-Ghanshyampur, Police Station-Naubatpur, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kr Singh, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323/34 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is case and counter case in which both sides sustained injuries. As per FIR, petitioner assaulted informant's son with lathi. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and the parties have compromised the matter as per compromise petition filed in the Court below contained in Annexure 3.
Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70634 of 2019(4) dt.27-02-2020 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Danapur, Patna in Naubatpur Police Station Case No. 321 of 2019 on the following conditions:-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T