← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13563/2017disposed

Shiv Pujan Mandal v. The Chairman Cum Managing Director And ANR

2018-04-24Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.13563 of 2017 dt.24-04-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13563 of 2017 =========================================================== Shiv Pujan Mandal, Son of Late Dhiju Mandal, Resident of Village- Simartalla, P.O.- Dilarpur, P.S.- Manihari, District- Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Chairman cum Managing Director, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. Authorised/In-charge Officer, (Billing Officer) Manihari, District- Katihar of North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anand Kumar Oha, Adv Mr. Ashok Kumar Karn, Adv =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-04-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to cancel the excess electric bill issued to the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the two bills for Rs. 2,330/- and Rs. 40,165/- (Annexure 2 and 3 respectively) raised by the respondent-power company are highly excessive and arbitrary considering that the petitioner is a resident of rural area and has not consumed electricity to the extent shown in the bills.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent-power company invites attention to para 5 of the counter affidavit to submit that the earlier bills have already been corrected for Rs. 3,138.25 and has been sent to the petitioner.

4. Having regard to the nature of the grievance of the petitioner and the stand of the respondent-power company as aforesaid, the writ petition is

Patna High Court CWJC No.13563 of 2017 dt.24-04-2018 disposed of with the observation that if the petitioner makes payment of the corrected bill he would be at liberty to represent before the respondentpower company for restoration of electricity to his premises.

5. The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 28.04.2018 Transmission Date NA