Salhera Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12768 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -178 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHARAJGANJ District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Salhera Devi, Wife of Jangi Yadav,

2. Guddu Kumari, Daughter of Jangi Yadav, Both are residents of Village- Hanhwa, Police Station- Maharajganj, District- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 178 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are mother-in-law and married Nanad of the deceased. The husband is already in custody.

In the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12768 of 2018 (2) dt.09-03-2018 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 178 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Siwan, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bond and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T