← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75036/2023dismissed

Md. Sakir Alam @ Shakir Alam @ Md. Shakir v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-27Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75036 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2022 Thana- BALRAMPUR District- Katihar ====================================================== Md. Sakir Alam @ Shakir Alam @ Md. Shakir Son Of Late Yasin Resident Of Village - Kurum, P.S. - Balia Belone, District - Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr .Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-02-2024 Heard learned cousnel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Balrampur ( Telta) P.S.Case No. 219 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302,120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The petitioner and others are said to have participated in killing of the deceased.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is not alleged to have fired on the deceased but he was standing out side the house and firing to support the person for fleeing away from the place of occurrence. The petitioner petitioner is in custody since 01.08.2023. The petitioner has got three criminal antecedents.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75036 of 2023(3) dt.27-02-2024 2/2

5. Considering the fact that even though some accused persons have been granted bail, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present, accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

6. The Trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude the same and if his trial is not concluded, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

7. With the above observation, this application is dismissed.

8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, VI the Katihar through FAX or e-mail forthwith for its compliance. (Sandeep Kumar, J) N.K/- U T