Pawan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71093 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2025 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== Pawan Kumar S/o Umesh Rajbanshi R/o Village - Chiraiya Goriadda, P.S - Sirdala, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-10-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5), 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that Santosh on information was apprehended with stolen motorcycle, further on information, house of petitioner was raided but he was not found in his house, but a motorcycle was recovered from a hut like shed in front of his house. 4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71093 of 2025(2) dt.14-10-2025 2/3 allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the motorcycle was not recovered from the house of the petitioner rather was recovered from a hut in front of the house of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the hut does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large. It is reiterated and submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young boy aged about 22 years and in the event if petitioner is sent to judicial custody, his entire career would get jeopardized and chances are bright that he may come in contact with hardened criminals.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sirdala P.S. Case No. 85 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71093 of 2025(2) dt.14-10-2025 3/3 7.

One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, Umesh Rajbanshi.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T